http://alloc.wordpress.com Being a Collection of Musings on just about anything I feel like talking about. Mon, 19 Oct 2009 08:25:50 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 http://alloc.wordpress.com/2007/08/31/house-md/#comment-34 slimmmarko Mon, 19 Oct 2009 08:25:50 +0000 http://alloc.wordpress.com/2007/08/31/house-md/#comment-34 Absolutely agree! By the way he has a hilarious book! Try it! Absolutely agree! By the way he has a hilarious book! Try it!

]]> http://alloc.wordpress.com/2007/01/21/differentiating-functions-in-c/#comment-33 pizer Tue, 21 Apr 2009 11:50:44 +0000 http://alloc.wordpress.com/2007/01/21/differentiating-functions-in-c/#comment-33 I'd like to point out that thid method should be used with care. There's a sweet spot somewhere for choosing 'h'. If 'h' is too large the discretization error will dominate the error. If 'h' is too small the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loss_of_significance" rel="nofollow">loss of significance</a> will dominate the error. I’d like to point out that thid method should be used with care. There’s a sweet spot somewhere for choosing ‘h’. If ‘h’ is too large the discretization error will dominate the error. If ‘h’ is too small the loss of significance will dominate the error.

]]> http://alloc.wordpress.com/2008/08/07/short-story-sprint-whiskeychat/#comment-31 Queen of Arcadia Tue, 02 Sep 2008 17:13:39 +0000 http://alloc.wordpress.com/?p=58#comment-31 I'll never understand why you weren't a stoner. I’ll never understand why you weren’t a stoner.

]]> http://alloc.wordpress.com/2008/05/21/whod-of-thought-a-cameraphone-would-actually-work%e2%80%bd/#comment-30 Sarah Wed, 11 Jun 2008 14:21:29 +0000 http://alloc.wordpress.com/?p=52#comment-30 Were you at the ball? Didn't see you there, dammit. Were you at the ball?
Didn’t see you there, dammit.

]]> http://alloc.wordpress.com/2008/04/12/45/#comment-21 And now for something else… « Jason’s musings Wed, 30 Apr 2008 20:22:17 +0000 http://alloc.wordpress.com/?p=45#comment-21 [...] And now for something else… Jump to Comments “james joyce cabal” [...] [...] And now for something else… Jump to Comments “james joyce cabal” [...]

]]> http://alloc.wordpress.com/2007/11/15/i-didnt-know-about-threadless/#comment-20 jason Fri, 29 Feb 2008 00:08:00 +0000 http://alloc.wordpress.com/2007/11/15/i-didnt-know-about-threadless/#comment-20 You obviously never listened to http://technolotics.com/blog/2005/09/technolotics-6-aids-in-uganda-hurricane-katrina/ You obviously never listened to http://technolotics.com/blog/2005/09/technolotics-6-aids-in-uganda-hurricane-katrina/

]]> http://alloc.wordpress.com/2007/11/15/i-didnt-know-about-threadless/#comment-19 Anonymous Thu, 03 Jan 2008 01:22:00 +0000 http://alloc.wordpress.com/2007/11/15/i-didnt-know-about-threadless/#comment-19 How could you not know about threadless! How could you not know about threadless!

]]> http://alloc.wordpress.com/2007/10/13/last-weekend-and-the-events-and-happenings-contained-therein/#comment-18 jason Sat, 13 Oct 2007 14:19:00 +0000 http://alloc.wordpress.com/2007/10/13/last-weekend-and-the-events-and-happenings-contained-therein/#comment-18 Reclining leather chairs really are the shit. I find they're even comfy for coding. Reclining leather chairs really are the shit. I find they’re even comfy for coding.

]]> http://alloc.wordpress.com/2007/01/08/changing-times-changing-perspectives/#comment-17 jason Tue, 11 Sep 2007 13:56:00 +0000 http://alloc.wordpress.com/2007/01/08/changing-times-changing-perspectives/#comment-17 Just like the Eastern attitude that man is fundamentally truthful, otherwise we cannot trust that when man says he is not truthful to be telling the truth (Knights and Knaves...). Just like the Eastern attitude that man is fundamentally truthful, otherwise we cannot trust that when man says he is not truthful to be telling the truth (Knights and Knaves…).

]]> http://alloc.wordpress.com/2007/01/08/changing-times-changing-perspectives/#comment-16 tvashtar Mon, 10 Sep 2007 09:03:00 +0000 http://alloc.wordpress.com/2007/01/08/changing-times-changing-perspectives/#comment-16 For that we fall back on an absolute notion of intentional inexistence, and consider that our meta-attitude to mind object interaction must surely rest on a corresponding semantic plane to that which supports it, and so apply the same rigour of ontological significance to each meta-ontic. For that we fall back on an absolute notion of intentional inexistence, and consider that our meta-attitude to mind object interaction must surely rest on a corresponding semantic plane to that which supports it, and so apply the same rigour of ontological significance to each meta-ontic.

]]>